In a study, Columbia University sociologist Sudhir Venkatesh found that 25 percent of prostitution clients in New York City were contacted over Facebook while 70 percent of those with mobile devices chose Blackberry as their mobile phone of choice. Because many sex workers loathe escort agencies for grabbing a piece of the action without providing security or support, a number of sex workers "self-incorporate and create a fake agency web page with swiped photos that make it appear as though they are part of a bigger operation.
In a sense, technology was empowering sex workers. The European Ugly Mugs app springs off a similar website with a solid history of use: Sites in Europe that list escorts have adapted to mobile, but sex worker advocates here in the U. According to "Prostitution and Sex Work" author Melissa Ditmore the illegality of prostitution creates a different kind of safety concern here than in Europe.
Such an app could be and probably would be surveilled by law enforcement, and this should be on people's minds when they use such technology. Baskin, the attorney, says the risks brought by such an app could be twofold: Because of the criminalization of prostitution in the states, it is more difficult for workers to protect themselves from retaliation by going to the police.
Baskin acknowledges that greater numbers of sex workers are using phones and online forums to conduct business with johns, and sees room for potential when it comes to apps, with some basic ground rules. Ironically, avoiding legal risk, not just for sex workers but also for webmasters, led to the creation of Safe IQ.
Recent legislative threats spurred E Designers to find a new separate entity to run its safety site, since if the law were passed, it could be a criminal offense for sex workers to access Ugly Mug services through a website with escort ads, which would be viewed as being akin to looking at child pornography.
The app means that legislation or no legislation sex workers could still be able to join the private Ugly Mugs site and use its directories without fear of criminal prosecution -- another example of sex workers adapting to technology. Three I thought of right away were "create", "design", and "make", but I wasn't sure which of them was the right one. So I asked some friends what they thought, and received the following additional suggestions: In my idiolect, create an app is more commonly used than design an app.
The former seems semantically more general. An app creator can personally do everything or might hire an app designer for graphics. On the basis of nothing more than my ear and memory I assert that "build" is used most within the tech community. You call yourself an "app developer" but do you "develop an app"? No, typically you "build an app. Of course I could be wrong. The following were produced by searching in the Corpus of Contemporary American English COCA by specifying a verb in any form followed by "an app" and outputting lemmas.
I have filtered out inapplicable entries like "is an app". The number preceding each entry is the frequency in the corpus. For the top two entries, I have additionalyl given a context breakdown. Your internal slang dictionary must be out of date. Much of its corpus is based on doing comparisons between equivalent items in different languages, e. Da pao with those meanings was around in Hong Kong in the s. Another for masturbating was da feigei da feiji, "shoot down an airplane".
Casual sex apps abound in the US—the best-known one is Tinder. There are a number of apps for casual sex in not-China, the most famous being Tinder not strictly for sex but… well, often it is , and, for gay men, Grindr most definitly for sex.
And Sockatume's right; "friends with benefits" is not only a valid translation, but it's the best translation out of the ones you cited. August 4, 4: Does Mr Mair have his tongue in his cheek, or is he seriously asking whether there are hook-up apps in the West?
Actually it's unclear to me whether "friends with benefits" is an apt translation or not in this context. To me that term denotes a relationship that's mostly about friendship, with occasional sex thrown in as an option, whereas a hookup suggests sex without a prerequisite relationship of any kind.
Both seem to fall under the rubric of "casual sex", though. August 4, 5: August 4, 7: There seems to be some clear phonological analogy. August 4, 8: Such a pleasure to find Victor Mair you don't own a cell phone.
I have one, but can best be described as a stupid one, i. It's an ancient Nokia, and far from being a smartphone. I wonder, though, if there were a "casual linguistics" app might both of us change our tune?
Casual sex, I assume, often involves the use of the tongue. August 4, August 5, 5: August 5, 6: I'm a tad surprised anyone is surprised at the existence of apps for casual sex.
I mean, I didn't independently think up the concept for myself, but when I heard of it it definitely fell into the obvious-in-retrospect department. August 5, 8: Wherever did they get that idea from?
August 5, 1: The different verbs to use with apps for me imply different types of involvement. So I would say e. August 5, 3: Coming from a technical background, I read "building" a piece of software as the process of compiling its source code into executable files, not that of conceiving, writing, and launching it.
Of course, it can be applied to the whole process by synecdoche, but I doubt that is what most people actually think they are doing. See, for instance, this Microsoft tutorial , which uses "build an app" only in this more restricted sense. I got a smartphone only relatively recently but had often heard tell of exciting "apps". When I did get one, I discovered these were just what were once called "programs". August 5, 7: It means a friend who is not your 'girlfriend' or 'boyfriend' but will give you sex.
You could argue that there is a difference between a 'friend with benefits', which suggests a 'friend' who happened to turn into a sex partner, and a 'fuck-buddy', which suggests a relationship that is purely focussed on no-strings-attached sex, but in practical terms I don't think there is a big difference. Both are about a person who will give you regular sex without a romantic relationship.
August 5, 9:.. 13 May After June 1, it'll be possible to hire a prostitute using an iPhone app. Sugar Sugar has managed to get Apple to grant its app a spot in the App Store. like prostitutes · New site helps students arrange casual sex 'hookups'. It's never been this easy to find local hookups in your city. to practice safe sex and not spread rumors if you see someone you know here. things in your desk or your car, along with some Wet Ones for that whore's bath I mentioned earlier!. Any promises, str8, minimalist sex apps for droid. Click here Register now it s up best dating app makes casual hookup app store, and meet local trans. Tokyo.